London tries to lead Europe while Washington stops listening
Keir Starmer spent the spring holding the line on Russia and Ukraine, refusing then partly granting Trump's request to launch Iran strikes from British bases, and signing the deals that hedge against an unreliable America.
Relationship Movements
8 shownLast 90 Days
Britain spent the spring trying to lead an anxious Europe while the American partnership it has built its foreign policy around stopped behaving like one. The hinge was the Iran war. On the eve of the late-February strikes, Donald Trump asked Keir Starmer for two British bases as launch pads for American bombers. The national security council said no. Days later, with Iranian retaliation already under way, Starmer reversed and granted access for what he called defensive operations. The cost was visible within hours. Iranian drones hit the British base in Cyprus and missiles landed near British forces in the Gulf. Royal Air Force fighters shot Iranian drones out of the sky over Iraq, Qatar, and Jordan. A destroyer was pulled from the English Channel to the eastern Mediterranean, and the Foreign Office began planning to evacuate three hundred thousand British nationals from the region.
The political fallout came from Washington, not Tehran. Trump spent April lashing out at Starmer in public, first over the base refusal and then over Britain's two percent digital services tax on American tech firms, threatening a big tariff if it was not dropped. The threat reopened a trade deal already capped at a ten percent baseline and forced London to prepare quietly for escalation. The answer was to pivot. A free-trade agreement with the six Gulf monarchies was signed late in the window, the first any Group of Seven country has reached with the bloc. A roughly eight-billion-pound Eurofighter contract with Turkey was sealed in London earlier in the spring, the largest British fighter export in two decades. The trilateral combat-aircraft program with Italy and Japan moved into full design with a new contract in early April.
On Russia the line held and then thinned. Starmer announced in late March that the Royal Navy would board the shadow fleet of tankers Moscow uses to evade oil sanctions when they entered British waters. By late April the press was reporting nearly a hundred sanctioned Russian vessels had crossed those waters with no boardings at all. London also wired about a billion dollars to Kyiv from profits on frozen Russian assets. The coalition Britain and France had built to put troops into a postwar Ukraine kept meeting, but no peace was on offer to underpin it. Mark Carney came to London in mid-March to coordinate. Then Starmer flew to Yerevan, the first British prime minister ever to visit Armenia, into a room organized around resisting Russia and a Caucasus tilting west. The week he came home, his ministers moved to nationalize the Scunthorpe steelworks owned by the Chinese conglomerate Jingye, breaking the careful reset with Beijing he had built in January. Beijing protested. London moved anyway.
Diplomatic Summary
Britain leans on the special relationship with the United States and the Atlantic alliance, but the Trump turn has pushed it to lead Europe on Russia and Ukraine.
Key Interests
- 01lead European response to Russia
- 02preserve special relationship with Washington
- 03open new export markets after Brexit
Britain holds a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, owns its own nuclear deterrent, co-founded the Atlantic alliance, and is the third party to the AUKUS submarine pact with the United States and Australia. It spends its foreign policy energy trying to be all of those things at once while no longer being a member of the European Union. Under Keir Starmer's Labour government, foreign secretary David Lammy has labelled the doctrine progressive realism, and it treats Washington as indispensable, Europe as inseparable, and Ukraine as the test of both. The Coalition of the Willing that London and Paris built to put troops into a postwar Ukraine is the clearest expression of the bet, and so is the slow reset with the European Union that ran through the May 2025 London summit. What sits underneath is a country trying to make Brexit pay while the global order it built its prosperity on comes apart. A 2025 defence review committed Britain to a NATO-first posture, a larger nuclear warhead programme, and a return to a NATO nuclear role, all at a pace the Treasury cannot comfortably afford. Trade deals with India, the United States, the European Union, South Korea, and now the Gulf states are the diversification answer. The Indo-Pacific tilt, the African retrenchment, the Chagos handover stuck in parliament, and the unresolved tension between a Labour base uneasy on Israel and a foreign service committed to it all return to the same question. What is a middle-sized nuclear power worth when the largest one is no longer a reliable partner?
Power Rankings
Overall #6Sources
11 cited- 01United Kingdom involvement in the 2026 Iran warWikipedia·2026-05-20
- 02
- 03Britain to Intercept Russian 'Shadow Fleet' Ships in UK WatersInsurance Journal·2026-03-26
- 04Russia Shadow Fleet Undeterred by Starmer's Threat as Ships Keep Crossing UK WatersInsurance Journal·2026-04-29
- 05UK and Gulf strike historic multi-billion-pound trade dealGOV.UK·2026-05-20
- 06Turkey signs $10.7 billion deal with UK for 20 Eurofighter jetsGreek Reporter·2026-03-26
- 07Edgewing receives first GCAP next-gen fighter international contractBreaking Defense·2026-04-02
- 08PM meeting with Prime Minister Pashinyan of Armenia: 4 May 2026GOV.UK·2026-05-04
- 09U.K. Moves to Fully Nationalize Chinese-Owned British SteelCaixin Global·2026-05-15
- 10PM meeting with Prime Minister Carney of Canada: 16 March 2026GOV.UK·2026-03-16
- 11UK contributes around $1 billion to Ukraine under G7 Russian asset-backed loan programKyiv Independent·2026-03-15